MLRagent

Rules

13 of 251 rules — including rules the source does not limit to any one scope

US-FB-003·21 CFR 202.1(e)(7)(viii)Disputed
Prescription-drug ad may lack fair balance if side-effect prominence trails efficacy
warningneeds human judgment
US-FB-014·Section III.C.1, Overall Location of Risk InformationDisputed
Include risk information in the main part of the piece
warningneeds human judgment
US-IND-005·21 CFR 202.1(e)(6)(xix)Disputed
Dosage safe for one patient class may not be implied safe/effective for another
blockerneeds human judgment
US-IND-012·Q.2/A.2, Factor 3Disputed
Communication is not consistent when labeling does not enable safe and effective use as suggested
blockerneeds human judgment
US-MIS-002·21 CFR 202.1(e)(3)(i)Disputed
Misleading omissions in prescription drug ads require added qualification within that part/theme
blockerneeds human judgment
US-MIS-013·21 CFR 202.1(e)(6)(xiv)Disputed
No misleading pooled statistics in prescription drug advertising
blockerneeds human judgment
US-MIS-044·Section III.A.2, Use of SignalsDisputed
Risk information should be preceded by a signal indicating risk information follows
warningneeds human judgment
US-NAME-007·21 CFR 202.1(b)(1)Disputed
Established name must accompany proprietary name each time featured in prescription drug ads
blockerneeds human judgment
US-NAME-020·Section II.ADisputed
Trademark and controlled-substance symbols do not count as intervening matter
notecheckable
US-NAME-026·Section II.BDisputed
Type size is measured by actual letter height, not point size
notecheckable
US-NAME-047·Section IIIDisputed
Combination products: active ingredients should be placed directly right of or below proprietary name
warningneeds human judgment
US-RISK-001·21 CFR 202.1(e)(1)-(3)Disputed
Prescription drug ads need true brief summary, with broadcast alternative
blockerneeds human judgment
US-RISK-029·Section III.A.4, Hierarchy of Risk InformationDisputed
FDA recommends stating the most important risk information first, especially in print
warningneeds human judgment